Case 6006243/2024 · Employment Tribunal
A Jenkins v Quinton Tyres Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6006243/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, proceeding under Rule 21, entered judgment for the claimant, A Jenkins, against Quinton Tyres Limited. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,204 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract in relation to unpaid bonus on dismissal and awarded £450 in damages. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s accrued but untaken annual leave entitlement on termination of employment, and the tribunal ordered payment of £770 gross for that element.
The judgment recorded a total amount payable of £2,424. It also included a notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 stating that interest would be payable on the award unless the sums were paid in full within 14 days after the written record was sent, with the relevant decision day given as 3 December 2024 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum. The hearing listed for 6 January 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,204. | Upheld | — | £1,204 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of unpaid bonus and ordered damages of £450. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken annual leave entitlement on termination and ordered payment of the gross sum of £770. | Upheld | — | £770 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,424
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.