Case 6006248/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Killick v Goldstar Corporate Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006248/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Curtis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Killick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Goldstar Corporate Limited made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay Mr D Killick during the course of his employment. It ordered the Respondent to pay GBP 1,015.39 as the total gross sum deducted.
The tribunal also found that the claim under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. It ordered payment of GBP 230.78 for leave that had accrued but had not been taken before termination of employment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the Claimant during employment. | Upheld | — | £1,015 |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim under regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded for leave accrued but not taken before termination. | Upheld | — | £231 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,246
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.