Case 6006319/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Diana Audit v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006319/2024
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Diana Audit
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Miss Diana Audit’s claim against Tesco Stores Limited. The judgment records that, under paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Employment Judge’s Case Management Orders dated 10 December 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out under rule 38.
The judgment does not determine any substantive liability issues and records no monetary award or other remedy. It is dated 31 January 2025 and is signed by Employment Judge Beyzade.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 38 for not being actively pursued after the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.