Case 6006333/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Castelli v The Ned Soho House LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006333/2024
- Decision date
- 8 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Castelli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a complaint of public interest disclosure detriment under s47B Employment Rights Act 1996. That complaint was struck out. The extracted judgment does not give reasons for the strike out beyond the order itself.
The same judgment also records that, by consent, the respondent agreed to pay the claimant outstanding holiday pay of £4.82. No separate findings or apportionment of that sum are given. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Nash on 4 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 8 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of public interest disclosure detriment under s47B Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out. The extracted judgment does not state the reason for strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the respondent agreed to pay the claimant outstanding holiday pay of £4.82. | Settled | — | £5 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s47B Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.