Case 6006394/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richard Lisseman v Air Spectrum Environment Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6006394/2024
- Decision date
- 6 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Richard Lisseman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 22 August 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr Richard Lisseman an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 31 July 2024 requiring further information about the nature of the claim, and/or that the claim had not been actively pursued. Mr Lisseman did not make written representations and did not request a hearing.
Because no representations were received, Acting Regional Employment Judge Jones struck out the claim on 6 September 2024. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim, and it does not contain any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive jurisdiction of the claim; it records only that the Tribunal had ordered further information about the nature of the claim and noted possible non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.