Case 6006418/2025 · Employment Tribunal
L Rebouh v The French Institute in London — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006418/2025
- Decision date
- 10 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kara Loraine
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Rebouh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment in the claim brought by L Rebouh against The French Institute in London. The hearing was at London Central on 26 September 2025 before Employment Judge Kara Loraine, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Maini-Thompson, Counsel.
The tribunal dealt only with the claim of automatically unfair dismissal under s.100 ERA 1996. It struck out that claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. No merits determination or remedy award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of automatically unfair dismissal under s.100 ERA 1996 was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.100 ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.