Case 6006440/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Evans v Crown Greetings UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6006440/2024
- Decision date
- 14 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr G Evans against Crown Greetings UK Limited. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,917.81, described as 10 days of salary for 1 to 10 May 2024.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £603.47, and found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, ordering £1,534.25 for 8 days. The hearing listed for 24 January 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,917.81, described as 10 days of salary from 1 to 10 May 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,918 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £603.47, described in the judgment as withheld pension contribution. | Upheld | — | £603 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £1,534.25, described as 8 days. | Upheld | — | £1,534 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,056
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.