Case 6006446/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alexander Jones v Department for Work and Pensions — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006446/2025
- Decision date
- 19 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alexander Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the Claimant's complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments pursuant to section 21 of the Equality Act was well-founded and succeeded.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records the remedy only: £5,000 for injury to feelings, £898.63 gross for financial losses, and interest of £392.33 on injury to feelings plus £35.26 on financial losses.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments under section 21 of the Equality Act was well-founded and succeeded. The award is not expressly labelled as attached to disability discrimination generally, but it is the only adjudicated claim. | Upheld | Disability | £5,326 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,326
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £899
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 21 of the EqA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.