Steven Pidgeon v Ares Renewables Ltd — 2026

Case reference: 6006516/2024
Decision date: 12 May 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Faulkner

Indexed: 6 June 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Steven Pidgeon

Respondent

Ares Renewables Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Faulkner struck out Steven Pidgeon's claim against Ares Renewables Limited. The Tribunal had written to the Claimant on 30 June 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 January 2025 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.

The warning letter gave the Claimant until 14 July 2025 to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The Claimant did not reply. The Judge was satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 applied and that strike out would accord with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment records no remedy or monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states that the Claim is struck out but does not identify the underlying pleaded claim type or any separate causes of action.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.