Case 6006532/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr Tyldsley, director — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006532/2024
- Decision date
- 16 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked as a chef for the respondent from on or around 1 April 2024 until 6 June 2024 without a written contract or payslips. He was offered and accepted work at an hourly rate of GBP 12.50 but was in fact paid at approximately GBP 9.73 per hour, leading to gross shortfalls of GBP 237.62 in April, GBP 648 in May and GBP 312.83 in June. The respondent did not file a response by the return date and a late postponement request was refused; the hearing proceeded on the basis of the claimant's sworn evidence, supported by his bank and HMRC records.
The Employment Judge found that a contract had been formed by someone with authority to bind the employer, that the respondent had failed to comply with its terms, and that the claimant had suffered loss in the gross amount given the timing within the tax year. The breach of contract claim succeeded and damages were awarded for the three months of underpayment.
On holiday pay, the Judge applied regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and calculated an entitlement of 9/52 x 28 days (one week) at average weekly hours of 45, awarding GBP 562.50 gross. The total sum payable was GBP 1,760.95. The Judge was not asked to and did not raise of her own motion any uplift for failure to provide a section 1 statement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for shortfall in agreed pay rate of GBP 12.50/hour: GBP 237.62 (April), GBP 648 (May), GBP 312.83 (June). Sum rounded to nearest GBP. | Upheld | — | £1,198 |
| Holiday pay | Gross sum of GBP 562.50 awarded under Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 14 for accrued but unpaid holiday on termination (9/52 x 28 days = 5 days at average 45 hours/week). Sum rounded to nearest GBP. | Upheld | — | £563 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,761
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Working Time Regulations 1998 regulation 14
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.