Case 6006545/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Butterfield v The Courtyard at Huntleys Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6006545/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Butterfield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,552.60, calculated as four weeks at £393.37 (£1,573.48) together with April 2024 salary of 173 hours at £11.44 (£1,979.12).
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,563.00, calculated as £10.42 per hour x 37.5 hours, giving £390.75 per week over four weeks.
The judgment was issued by Employment Judge KM Ross on 29 November 2024 and sent to the parties on 5 December 2024. A notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, identifying 5 December 2024 as the relevant decision day and 8% as the stipulated rate of interest.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal ordered gross sum of £3,552.60, comprising £393.37 x 4 weeks (£1,573.48) and April 2024 salary of 173 hours x £11.44 (£1,979.12). | Upheld | — | £3,553 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal ordered £1,563.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement (£10.42 x 37.5 = £390.75 per week x 4). | Upheld | — | £1,563 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,116
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.