Case 6006580/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Fleming v Lift Schools — 2026
- Case reference
- 6006580/2025
- Decision date
- 17 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Fleming
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Singh held that Ms K Fleming’s claim against Lift Schools for unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. Her claim for direct sex discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The indirect sex discrimination and victimisation claims were both held to be well-founded and succeeded. The judgment records no factual findings, legal reasoning, or remedy determination, and specifies no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect sex discrimination claim. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment does not identify the protected act underlying the victimisation claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.