Case 6006595/2025 · Employment Tribunal
L Georgieva v Envelope Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006595/2025
- Decision date
- 26 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Georgieva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, L Georgieva, presented the claim on 26 February 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. No live evidential dispute is described in the judgment text beyond the resulting findings and awards.
The tribunal found that Envelope Group Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered it to pay £6,249.00 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £300.00 in damages for contracted use of personal equipment in the course of work.
The judgment records a total award of £6,549.00. No separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or any other remedy component is mentioned in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £6,249.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,249 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and also awards £300.00 for contracted use of personal equipment in the course of work; the text does not separate those heads more clearly. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,549
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.