Case 6006598/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. M Munton v Scott Baines & Kristian Heames t/a Football Development Schools — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006598/2024
- Decision date
- 7 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. M Munton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 24 July 2024. Employment Judge Heap recorded that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and that a determination could properly be made under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds, but it does not set out any liability findings by claim head in the extracted text. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was instead left to a Remedy Hearing.
A preliminary hearing to make orders for the remedy hearing was listed for 20 January 2025. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 22 default judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge stated that the claim succeeds. The extracted text does not identify the underlying causes of action or any split of liability, and remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.