Case 6006623/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Hutcheson v Elcarbec Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6006623/2024
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Hutcheson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Barker made a Rule 21 determination. On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £288.00, calculated as three days' wages at £96 per day. The judgment also recorded that no award was made for holiday pay because the claimant had not provided information about the amount claimed.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £960.96 in damages, calculated as two weeks' notice at £480.48 per week. The judgment states that this was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £1,441.44, calculated as 1 x 3 x £480.48. The total gross sum payable was £2,690.40.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as 3 days' wages at £96 per day. | Upheld | — | £288 |
| Holiday pay | No award was made because the claimant did not provide information about the amounts claimed. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Awarded for notice pay; calculated as 2 weeks' notice at £480.48 per week using gross pay to reflect possible tax treatment as post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £961 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded as 1 x 3 x £480.48. | Upheld | — | £1,441 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,690
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.