Case 6006632/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Frances Connolly v SG Transport Training & Logistics Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) NFR Training Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006632/2024
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Frances Connolly
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 26 February 2025, the Tribunal gave Miss Frances Connolly an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the complaint of a failure to pay a redundancy payment should not be struck out. The Tribunal identified the reason as lack of reasonable prospect of success because the Claimant had not been dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The Claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of a failure to pay a redundancy payment.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Heap on 21 March 2025. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal struck out the complaint of a failure to pay a redundancy payment because it considered the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, on the basis that the Claimant had not been dismissed by reason of redundancy. The Claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 26 February 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.