Case 6006684/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Morrigan v Quantum Coffee Roasters Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006684/2025
- Decision date
- 1 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Morrigan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by video on 15 August 2025, struck out the claimant’s claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a). Employment Judge S Moore recorded three bases for strike-out: the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, the proceedings had been conducted unreasonably, and the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a tribunal order.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no separate merits findings on any individual head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claimant’s claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a). The judgment states the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, the proceedings had been conducted unreasonably, and the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a Tribunal order. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.