Case 6006730/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the First v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006730/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting in chambers at Plymouth on 22 April 2025 before Employment Judge N J Roper, recorded that the claimant, Ms Amanda Corkin, was in person and that the first and second respondents were represented by Ms J Ram, Solicitor, and Mr S Prophet of Counsel respectively. The judgment concerns the claimant’s unfair dismissal claims only.
The tribunal stated that the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment also expressly noted that this did not affect the claimant’s remaining claims as set out in the case management order of the same date. No remedy was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. It also notes that this did not affect the claimant’s remaining claims listed in the case management order of the same date. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.