Case 6006861/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Marcus Newell v Solicitors Regulation Authority Limited RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2026
- Case reference
- 6006861/2025
- Decision date
- 5 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Marcus Newell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented a single claim of disability discrimination, later clarified as a claim under sections 20-21 Equality Act 2010 for failure to make reasonable adjustments. He relied on autism and alleged that the respondent did not provide enough time or support before dismissing him following probationary review matters.
The tribunal found that the claimant was in serious default of previous orders and that the original claim lacked basic information needed for the respondent to understand the case. However, because some further particulars had been provided and the respondent accepted that a fair trial would be possible if final details were supplied, the tribunal refused the respondent's strike-out application as premature.
The tribunal made an unless order requiring the claimant to provide an impact statement, the medical report referred to, details of the provision, criterion or practice relied on, the alleged disadvantage, and the adjustments said to be required. If the claimant remained in default by 26 January 2026, the claim would be struck out without further order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The preliminary hearing did not determine the merits of the disability discrimination claim. The respondent's strike-out application was refused, but the claim was made subject to an unless order requiring further particulars and evidence by 26 January 2026. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 39
- Rules 37(1)(a)(c)
- s6 Equality Act 2010
- s20-21 Equality Act 2010
- Taylor v Tesco Stores Ltd [2023] EAT 11
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.