Case 6006866/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Leighann Jordan v Marks and Spencer plc FINAL HEARING — 2026
- Case reference
- 6006866/2025
- Decision date
- 18 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Leighann Jordan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment is confined to remedy. The tribunal ordered Marks and Spencer PLC to pay Leighann Jordan £21,667.32 following the disability discrimination proceedings. The underlying liability findings and the summary reasons given orally at the hearing are not reproduced in the written judgment.
The award comprised £1,463.34 net for company sick pay not paid between 1 November and 7 December 2024, together with £243.90 for the associated employer pension contributions. The net sick-pay figure was calculated from £2,032.42 gross after deductions for notional income tax and employee National Insurance contributions.
The tribunal awarded £17,587.50 for injury to feelings. It calculated that figure by reducing a gross injury-to-feelings award of £23,450 by 25% because of the claimant's failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. It also awarded £109.82 interest on the sick-pay and pension sums and £2,262.76 interest on the injury-to-feelings award, applying an interest rate of 8%.
The respondent was ordered to provide a reconciliation statement concerning the December 2024 and January 2025 payslips, giving the claimant credit for the sick-pay and pension awards and for relevant repayments already made. Payment was due within 14 days after the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment is confined to remedy and does not restate the underlying liability findings or oral reasons. The claim classification follows the case's disability-discrimination listing and the injury-to-feelings award. | Upheld | Disability | £21,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,667
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,707
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.