Case 6006926/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Cawley v Creative Management Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006926/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Cawley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. It ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £702, calculated as 4 x 1.5 x £117, and a compensatory award of £4,680 net. The compensatory award was made up of immediate loss of £3,158, calculated as 38 x £94 less earnings of £414, future losses of £1,222 for 13 weeks' net pay, and £300 for loss of statutory rights.
The claimant's direct age discrimination claim was recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal. The written record states that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,382 |
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the direct age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,382
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £702
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,680
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.