Case 6006938/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D McCavish v Teleperformance limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6006938/2024
- Decision date
- 18 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D McCavish
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr D McCavish's claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was successful. Teleperformance Ltd was ordered to pay £103.25 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also recorded that the claim for notice pay under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was successful. Teleperformance Ltd was ordered to pay £328.24 net for that claim. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons were included in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was successful and awards £103.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £103 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for notice pay under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was successful and awards £328.24 net. | Upheld | — | £328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £431
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.