Case 6006985/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Din v London Borough of Newham — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006985/2025
- Decision date
- 5 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Din
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have 2 years' continuous service as an employee.
The tribunal also dismissed the breach of contract claim because it was brought outside the time limit set out in the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, in circumstances where it was reasonably practicable to bring it within time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have 2 years' continuous service as an employee. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because it was brought beyond the time limit set out in the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, when it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- 2 years' continuous service
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.