Case 6007124/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bragg v Jamie Lewis — 2024
- Case reference
- 6007124/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bragg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. The tribunal upheld Mr J Bragg's claim that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered Jamie Lewis to pay £2,076.92 gross, described as four weeks' pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £400 in damages, described in the judgment as an estimate of one week's net salary after PAYE deductions. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £311.58, described as three days' pay.
A further claim for reimbursement of expenses was dismissed because the tribunal was not satisfied that there had been an agreement to reimburse those expenses. The judgment therefore records a total monetary award of £2,788.50 across the claims that succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,076.92, described as four weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £2,077 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £400, described as an estimate of one week's net salary after PAYE deductions. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £311.58, described as three days' pay. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal was not satisfied that there was an agreement for the claimant to be reimbursed for the expenses claimed, so that claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,789
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.