Case 6007218/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lyndsey Shearing v Mr Cosmetics Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007218/2024
- Decision date
- 30 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Lyndsey Shearing
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Lyndsey Shearing was dismissed orally by Mr Cosmetics Limited on 21 June 2024 and the dismissal was confirmed in writing on 26 June 2024 as being for gross misconduct. The Tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent genuinely believed she had committed misconduct. Her withdrawal of £25,000 from the company account followed advance notice from her solicitors and was consistent, apart from the form of notice, with the parties’ previous practice. The allegations in the dismissal letter were not supported by an investigation or contemporaneous evidence.
The Tribunal found that no allegations were put to Mrs Shearing before dismissal, no meeting or investigation took place, and no evidence was gathered. The respondent accepted that the ACAS Code was not followed. The proposed appeal, to be chaired by the respondent’s solicitor after dismissal, did not remedy the procedural unfairness. The Tribunal found there were no reasonable grounds for a belief in misconduct and that dismissal without a fair and reasonable process fell outside the range of reasonable responses. The unfair dismissal claim therefore succeeded.
Reinstatement was refused as impracticable and inappropriate because the Non-Molestation Order restricted communication, Mrs Shearing maintained that Mr Shearing must work separately from her, and working relationships had become strained. She did not seek re-engagement. The Tribunal found that she had reasonably mitigated her loss, applied a 50% Polkey reduction because a fair process might have resulted in dismissal for some other substantial reason, applied a 20% uplift for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code, and found no contributory fault. The basic award was payable in full and the compensatory award was subject to the statutory cap of 52 weeks’ pay, but the precise amounts were left for the parties to agree within 28 days or for determination at a remedy hearing.
The wrongful dismissal/breach of contract notice-pay claim also succeeded by agreement. Mrs Shearing was awarded £3,146.04 gross for her statutory entitlement to 12 weeks’ notice, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The precise compensation amount was not determined in this judgment. The parties were directed to agree it within 28 days, failing which a remedy hearing would be listed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The wrongful dismissal/breach of contract notice-pay complaint was resolved by agreement. The award represents 12 weeks’ notice pay, gross, subject to tax and National Insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £3,146 |
Legal tests applied
5 references- genuine belief in misconduct, reasonable grounds for that belief, and a reasonable investigation
- range of reasonable responses
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- Polkey reduction
- contributory fault
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.