Case 6007223/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C A Brissett v St Stephens Health Centre — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007223/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C A Brissett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C A Brissett did not attend the preliminary hearing on 27 January 2025. She emailed the Tribunal that morning to say she needed to attend a medical appointment. The Tribunal recorded that she had not complied with earlier orders and, until that email, had not contacted either the Tribunal or the respondent after presenting her claim.
After the hearing, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant saying it was considering striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. She was given until 24 February 2025 to make written representations or request a hearing, and was also ordered to provide evidence of the medical appointment and further specific information about the claim. She did not make representations, did not request a hearing, and did not comply with either order. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim and dismissed it because it had not been actively pursued and because Tribunal orders had not been complied with.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not state the substantive claim label in the reasons; this claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing category and the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.