Case 6007250/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steven Ewels v Euro Foods Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007250/2024
- Decision date
- 10 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rao REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steven Ewels
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rao sat at the East London Hearing Centre by CVP and held that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of suspension pay was well-founded. The tribunal found that the claimant had been suspended from 28 February 2024 to 22 March 2024, amounting to 18 working days, and accepted that he was entitled to basic salary during that period. Using a rate of £1,000 gross per day and 62 working days per year, the tribunal calculated suspension pay of £4,292.31, from which £3,026.45 had already been paid, leaving £1,265.86 outstanding.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and applied a 10% uplift under s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, producing an additional £126.60 on the suspension pay award. The complaint of unauthorised deductions in respect of holiday pay for the 2022 and 2023 calendar years was dismissed.
By consent, the holiday pay complaint for the 2024 calendar year was found well-founded. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to pay for holidays accrued but untaken when the claimant's employment ended, and awarded £1,100 together with a 10% s.207A uplift of £110. The judgment sum due was recorded as £2,602, comprising the suspension pay, the two uplifts, and the holiday pay award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for pay during suspension from 28 February 2024 to 22 March 2024. The tribunal calculated £1,265.86 outstanding wages and a 10% s.207A uplift of £126.60. | Upheld | — | £1,392 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim for the 2022 and 2023 calendar years was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | By consent. Holiday pay claim for the 2024 calendar year succeeded because the respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but untaken on termination; the tribunal awarded £1,100 plus a 10% s.207A uplift of £110. | Upheld | — | £1,210 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,602
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £237
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.