Case 6007271/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Ilario Falcone v APT Group Holdings Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007271/2026
- Decision date
- 9 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ilario Falcone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 27 February 2026. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Abbott decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that APT Group Holdings Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Ilario Falcone's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,287.00 gross. The judgment states that this sum includes an adjustment because the claimant had taken more annual leave than he was entitled to before the end of his employment. The hearing listed for 18 June 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records unauthorised deductions from wages and awards £3,287.00 gross. It also states the figure accounts for an adjustment for annual leave taken in excess of entitlement, but it does not separately adjudicate a working time or holiday pay claim. | Upheld | — | £3,287 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,287
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.