Case 6007272/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Intesacommunications Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6007272/2024
- Decision date
- 31 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent failed to file an ET3. Employment Judge Joffe determined the claim on the ET1 without a hearing under the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages of £1,018.50 and had failed to pay holiday pay of £679.00. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,697.50 in total and to account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the papers; the tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages in this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,019 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment on the papers; the tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay in this sum. | Upheld | — | £679 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,698
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.