Case 6007272/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Vincentia Gray Allison v Starlybek Care Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007272/2025
- Decision date
- 24 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Vincentia Gray Allison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Vincentia Gray Allison, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Starlybek Care Ltd. The tribunal held that she had been employed for less than two years, and therefore was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 March 2025 giving her an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out. It found that she failed to provide an acceptable reason. The judgment therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 24 May 2025, and was signed by Employment Judge Burge on 16 May 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant had less than two years' service, so she was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 March 2025 inviting reasons why the complaint should not be struck out; no acceptable reason was provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.