Case 6007279/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. J. Cameron-Jackson v Stagecoach Cumbria and North Lancashire Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007279/2024
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. J. Cameron-Jackson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a bus driver, alleged that she was entitled to resign and treat herself as dismissed after bullying and harassment by colleagues connected with unfounded allegations of theft. The issues identified for the tribunal included whether there was a dismissal, whether the respondent took adequate steps to prevent the treatment continuing, whether the grievance was handled reasonably and promptly, and whether any breach of trust and confidence caused the resignation without affirmation.
The available text records the respondent's position that management initially dealt with matters informally in line with the claimant's wishes, later encouraged a formal grievance, and that Mr Lowe's continued presence before his absence and resignation did not amount to a fundamental breach. The respondent also submitted that the claimant resigned months after the alleged last straw, had indicated earlier that she contemplated resignation and constructive dismissal, continued to receive sick pay, and affirmed any alleged breach.
The PDF text available for extraction lists relevant constructive dismissal authorities and then shows headings for submissions and conclusions, but it does not set out the tribunal's actual conclusion or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment text states that the claimant complained she had been constructively dismissed, but the extracted PDF text does not state the tribunal's final disposal under the 'Conclusions and decision' heading. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC Ltd) v Sharp
- Malik v BCCI
- British Aircraft Corporation Ltd v Austin
- Post Office v Roberts
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest London Borough Council
- Meikle v Nottinghamshire County Council
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
- Buckland v Bournemouth University
- W A Goold (Pearmak) Ltd v McConnell
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.