Case 6007305/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Mason v Excellerate Services UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007305/2025
- Decision date
- 5 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Mason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central via CVP on 3 December 2025 before Employment Judge Davidson. The tribunal did not determine either claim on the merits. Instead, it struck out the unfair dismissal complaint and the breach of contract complaint.
The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years, and the tribunal held that he was not entitled to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal. The breach of contract complaint was also struck out because the tribunal held that it did not fall within its jurisdiction. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and was not entitled to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Struck out because the claim did not fall within the tribunal's jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.