Case 6007323/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Fernquest v HR Star Consulting Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007323/2024
- Decision date
- 8 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Fernquest
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Southampton by video on 31 March 2026, Employment Judge Gray determined a preliminary issue in the case between Miss K Fernquest and HR Star Consulting Ltd. The tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the times material to the claim, by reason of the impairment of anxiety and depression.
The written judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the underlying complaint, any remedy award, or any split between heads of loss. It is therefore limited to the tribunal's disability-status finding only. The decision was dated 31 March 2026 and sent to the parties on 8 April 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records a preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material times, by reason of anxiety and depression. It does not record a substantive liability finding on any pleaded claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.