Case 6007344/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Anna Lowery v Pelaw and District Social Club Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007344/2024
- Decision date
- 14 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anna Lowery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim brought by Anna Lowery against Pelaw and District Social Club Ltd was listed for hearing at Newcastle on 14 April 2025 before Employment Judge Sweeney. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent attended by its solicitor, Allyn Walton.
The tribunal noted the claimant's failure to attend and her failure to respond to enquiries about her absence or to alert the tribunal and respondent to her non-attendance. Having considered the pleadings, documents, and statements available, the tribunal dismissed the proceedings pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record. No substantive findings on the underlying claim were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The proceedings were dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant failed to attend and did not respond to enquiries about her absence. No merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.