Case 6007345/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A A Khan v BA Food Service Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007345/2025
- Decision date
- 4 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A A Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRegional Employment Judge Burgher, sitting alone, gave judgment in favour of the claimant after the respondent failed to respond or attend. The claims for unlawful deduction of wages and unpaid holiday pay both succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total gross sum of £8,726.08, comprising £5,994.56 for unpaid salary May-October 2024 (524 hours at £11.44/hour), £1,605.12 for unpaid accrued holiday pay (5.7 weeks at £281.60), and £1,126.40 (4 weeks' pay at £281.60) for failure to provide a written contract of employment. The amounts are gross, with the respondent entitled to make tax and National Insurance deductions before payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid salary May 2024 - October 2024: 524 hours x £11.44/hour. | Upheld | — | £5,995 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid accrued holiday pay: 5.7 weeks x £281.60. | Upheld | — | £1,605 |
| Other | Failure to provide written contract of employment - 4 weeks' pay (4 x £281.60). Implied s.38 Employment Act 2002 award. | Upheld | — | £1,126 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,726
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.