Case 6007404/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bower v Maris Logistics Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007404/2024
- Decision date
- 6 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edwards REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bower
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of payments dated 19 August 2024 and 20 September 2024, and it also dismissed the breach of contract complaint about mileage expenses. By contrast, it upheld the breach of contract complaint about notice pay and awarded one week's pay, stated as £1,067.30, as damages. The tribunal said the figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal also upheld the holiday pay complaint, finding that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The written record states that the claimant was to receive two days' pay, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance, but the extracted text does not state the numeric amount of that award. The tribunal further found that the respondent failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period 1 May 2023 to 27 December 2024.
On the separate written statement issue, the tribunal found that when the proceedings were begun the respondent was not in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. The claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal, and the respondent's employer contract claim was also dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of payments dated 19 August 2024 and 20 September 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to notice pay; the tribunal awarded one week's pay as damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £1,067 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998; the tribunal ordered two days' pay, but the extracted text does not state the numeric amount. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to mileage expenses. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The respondent failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period 1 May 2023 to 27 December 2024. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | When the proceedings were begun, the respondent was not in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. |
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.