Case 6007414/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Kang v NSL Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007414/2024
- Decision date
- 28 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Kang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Leith dismissed Mr G Kang's complaints against NSL Limited after a hearing at Croydon on 20 to 24, 27 and 28 July 2026. The complaints were unfair dismissal, breach of contract, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The judgment records that all five complaints failed. It contains no monetary award. Full reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment does not set out the facts, legal tests or reasoning behind the outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.