Case 6007448/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Saskia Marson v Gwanmesia Plastic Surgery Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007448/2025
- Decision date
- 4 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Saskia Marson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was given by consent. The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay notice pay on termination. It also recorded that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay wages and accrued holiday pay on termination in the net sum of GBP 1,287.07. Remedy was to be determined at a later hearing listed for 8 December 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint is dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent breached the claimant's contract by failing to pay notice pay on termination. Remedy was listed to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that unauthorised deductions were made when wages and accrued holiday pay were not paid on termination in the net sum of GBP 1,287.07. | Upheld | — | £1,287 |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.