Case 6007454/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Wise v Elfreda Sarfo Akrade (trading as Sarfo Solicitors) — 2024
- Case reference
- 6007454/2024
- Decision date
- 23 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Wise
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bury St Edmunds CVP hearing on 12 December 2024, Employment Judge Graham entered a judgment by consent in Miss L Wise's case against Elfreda Sarfo Akrade, trading as Sarfo Solicitors. The judgment records that the claims for notice pay, holiday pay and redundancy pay succeeded.
The parties agreed that the respondent would pay £10,475.17. The judgment says this figure was the difference between the agreed sum of £21,758.54 and payments already made by the respondent.
The judgment did not determine the claimant's remaining complaints of breach of contract, unauthorised deductions from wages, and maternity and pregnancy discrimination. Those matters were left to proceed to a final hearing, and the judgment does not apportion the consent sum between the successful heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Notice pay | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,475
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.