Case 6007498/2025 · Employment Tribunal
B Enning v Sutton Housing Partnership Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007498/2025
- Decision date
- 24 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
B Enning
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed B Enning's claim against Sutton Housing Partnership Limited after he failed to attend the preliminary hearing on 24 July 2026. When contacted by the Tribunal, he said that he did not wish to pursue his claim and that he had forgotten about it and ignored it, hence his non-attendance.
Employment Judge Rice-Birchall found that Rule 47 applied and that the information available after reasonable enquiry had been taken into account. The judge concluded that dismissal accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The hearing listed for 8, 9 and 10 February 2027 would not take place. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claim as a whole without identifying the underlying cause or causes of action. Dismissal was under Rule 47 following non-attendance, with no findings on the substantive merits recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47
- Rule 3 (overriding objective)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.