Case 6007501/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Aderonke Kuburat Akin-Taylor v The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007501/2024
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Aderonke Kuburat Akin-Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Aderonke Kuburat Akin-Taylor brought a claim of unfair dismissal against The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy. The hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 30 and 31 January 2025 before Employment Judge Byrne, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The written judgment records only the outcome: the unfair dismissal claim was not upheld and was dismissed. No factual findings or substantive legal reasoning are set out in the written record provided beyond that disposal.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the claim for unfair dismissal was not upheld and was dismissed. No separate remedy was recorded in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.