Case 6007516/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Athwal v Morrison Water Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007516/2025
- Decision date
- 5 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Siddique Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Athwal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the tribunal determined that Mr Athwal was disabled at the material time within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment did not determine the merits of his disability discrimination or unfair dismissal claims and made no award of compensation.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Athwal experienced a mental impairment characterised by work-related stress and anxiety from November 2023 to February 2025. This was supported by contemporaneous GP records, fit notes and his evidence that he used acupuncture, cupping and herbal treatment. It did not find that the evidence established depression, panic attacks or hypertension, or that his long-standing urinary symptoms were connected to stress and anxiety.
The accepted impairment adversely affected normal day-to-day activities through significant sleeping difficulties, persistent exhaustion, anxiety and an inability to sustain work-related functioning. By November 2023, the symptoms had resulted in a prolonged absence from work supported by GP fit notes. The tribunal found that these effects were more than minor or trivial and therefore substantial.
Although Mr Athwal returned to work after January 2024 and appeared to cope for a period, the tribunal found that similar work-related stressors were likely to persist and that there was a real possibility of the substantial adverse effects recurring. Applying paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to the Equality Act 2010 and assessing likelihood from the circumstances prevailing at the relevant time, it concluded that the impairment was long term. The later absence in November 2024 was treated as confirming the identified risk rather than as retrospective evidence used to establish the original likelihood of recurrence.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This judgment determined only the preliminary issue of whether the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that he was disabled at the material time but did not adjudicate the merits of the disability discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010 disability test
- section 212(1) Equality Act 2010 substantial effect test
- paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to the Equality Act 2010 long-term and recurrence test
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] ICR 1052 EAT
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council [2017] ICR 610
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College [2008] ICR 431
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.