Case 6007525/2025 · Employment Tribunal
ChinPong Tang v Ko Micciu Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007525/2025
- Decision date
- 4 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ChinPong Tang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Joffe determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 without a hearing, after the Respondent failed to file an ET3. The Judge considered the ET1 and decided the claim could properly be determined on the papers.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the Claimant wages in the sum of £91.60 and holiday pay in the sum of £68.70. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the total sum of £160.30, and the hearing previously listed for 13 June was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the Respondent unlawfully failed to pay the Claimant wages of £91.60. | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay holiday pay of £68.70. | Upheld | — | £69 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £160
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.