Case 6007570/2024 · Employment Tribunal
A Oluyeye v Jacksonwell Recruitment Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6007570/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Oluyeye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 without a listed hearing. Employment Judge Dunlop found that Jacksonwell Recruitment Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £711.00, comprised of £561.00 for 51 hours at £11.00 per hour and £150.00 for three sleep-ins at £50 per sleep-in.
The tribunal also stated that it had no jurisdiction to award compensation for non-financial losses, including distress, arising from the non-payment of wages, so no additional award was made. The separate notice on interest recorded the relevant decision day as 10 December 2024, the calculation day as 11 December 2024, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum, but the judgment itself did not quantify any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £711.00, made up of £561.00 for 51 hours at £11.00 per hour and £150.00 for 3 sleep-ins at £50 each. | Upheld | — | £711 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £711
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.