Case 6007578/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Price v Worcester Business Improvement District — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007578/2025
- Decision date
- 7 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr W Price, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Worcester Business Improvement District. The tribunal recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have at least two years' service in order to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that Mr Price had been employed for less than two years. On that basis, it concluded that he was not entitled to bring the proceedings. The judgment does not record any merits determination of the dismissal complaint itself.
The claimant responded to the strike-out warning on 7 July 2025, but the tribunal found that he had not given an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim because section 108 ERA 1996 requires two years' service and the claimant had less than two years' service. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.