Case 6007621/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Richards v Evri — 2024
- Case reference
- 6007621/2024
- Decision date
- 29 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave Mr S Richards an opportunity by letter dated 20 November 2024 to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 30 September 2024, the claim had not been actively pursued, and he had not replied to the tribunal's letter dated 17 October 2024.
Mr Richards did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Hutchinson struck out the claim. The judgment records only that the claim was struck out; it does not determine the merits of the underlying dispute.
The hearing listed for 11 December 2024 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not restate the underlying cause of action, but the case listing identifies it as an unfair dismissal matter. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order dated 30 September 2024, had not actively pursued the case, and did not reply to the tribunal's letter dated 17 October 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.