Case 6007631/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Respondent: Mr L Zawadzki The Co-operative Group HELD AT: Manchester v Mr L Zawadzki The Co-operative Group HELD AT: Manchester — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007631/2024
- Decision date
- 28 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Respondent: Mr L Zawadzki The Co-operative Group HELD AT: Manchester
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge Porter, determined a single claim of unfair dismissal brought by Mr L Zawadzki against The Co-operative Group. The agreed issues concerned whether the respondent had shown a potentially fair reason for dismissal under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, whether the respondent acted reasonably in treating misconduct as a sufficient reason to dismiss, and whether the procedure followed and the sanction of dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses. The tribunal also considered the Polkey principle and contributory conduct.
Having heard evidence from the claimant and his witnesses, and from the respondent's investigating officer, dismissing officer and appeal officer, the tribunal concluded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The tribunal further found that the claimant contributed to his dismissal by blameworthy conduct and that it was just and equitable to reduce both the basic and compensatory awards by 50%.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £10,611.05, comprising a basic award of £2,070.00 and a compensatory award of £8,541.05. The recoupment regulations apply, with a prescribed element of £8,291.05 covering the period 8 March 2024 to 9 December 2024, leaving an excess of £2,320.00 over the prescribed element.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed but also found the claimant contributed to the dismissal; basic and compensatory awards were each reduced by 50% on just and equitable grounds. | Upheld | — | £10,611 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,611
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,070
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,541
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- band of reasonable responses
- Polkey principle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.