Case 6007631/2025 · Employment Tribunal
H Morgan v GFW Trading Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007631/2025
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H Morgan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the Employment Tribunal on 5 March 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Phil Allen decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure without a full response from the respondent.
The tribunal found that GFW Trading Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) had failed to pay H Morgan's holiday entitlement. Judgment was therefore entered for the claimant in the sum of £390.00.
The written record also included the Tribunal Office interest notice. It stated that the relevant decision day was 29 July 2025, the calculation day was 30 July 2025, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after the 14-day period described in the notice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal entered judgment under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The short judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £390
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.