Case 6007637/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Moussa v Kryptos Protocol Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6007637/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Moussa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Moussa presented a claim against Kryptos Protocol in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 8 August 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The tribunal therefore upheld the wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £7,655 gross.
The judgment also states that the respondent must pay the claimant £7,655 in total. No separate breakdown of the award is given beyond that figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21. The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £7,655 gross. | Upheld | — | £7,655 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,655
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.