Case 6007702/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Anderson v Galvan London Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6007702/2024
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to Miss S Anderson on 27 September 2024 asking her to provide a calculation of what she was claiming. It repeated that request on 8 October 2024 and also asked for other contact details for the respondent.
On 18 October 2024 the Tribunal wrote again, saying that it had not received a reply to the earlier correspondence, that it appeared the claim was no longer being pursued, and that Employment Judge Spencer was considering striking the claim out unless the claimant objected by 1 November 2024 or requested a hearing. No response was provided.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the underlying claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.